Ranking & Retrieval · SIGIR 2026 & ICTIR 2026

My rough classification of the ranking & retrieval papers

I was going through the ranking-and-retrieval papers now in the ACM DL for SIGIR 2026 and ICTIR 2026 and roughly classified them. The shape I kept seeing: reasoning and LLM agents have moved from a consumer of IR to the thing being reranked, retrieved for, and judged.

Scope: ranking, retrieval, RAG, recommendation & search evaluation  |  255 papers catalogued below with DOIs (211 SIGIR, 44 ICTIR)
My overall read: the field is reorganizing itself around reasoning. Rankers now think before they score, retrievers are being rebuilt to serve autonomous agents rather than human sessions, and the evaluation community is in an open fight over whether LLMs can be trusted to produce the relevance labels that everything else depends on.

Roughly, the papers fell into five groups

1 Ranking has become a reasoning problem

The clearest change. Rankers increasingly "think" before scoring, and a parallel line of work asks whether that reasoning is stable or just expensive. The frontier question is no longer how to score but when reasoning is worth its cost.

Anchors: Rank-R1 SIGIR (DOI · arXiv) · Think When Needed SIGIR (DOI) · Does Form Affect Function? ICTIR (DOI) · Internalizing Explicit Reasoning into Latent Space for Dense Retrieval SIGIR (DOI)

2 Retrieval is being rebuilt for agents & deep research

A large, fast-growing cluster argues that retrievers trained to serve humans are the wrong retrievers for multi-step agents. New benchmarks, planners, and trajectory-trained retrievers treat search as an iterative, tool-using process — and are starting to measure it at real-world scale.

Anchors: DeepResearchGym ICTIR (DOI) · HiRA SIGIR (DOI) · Learning to Retrieve from Agent Trajectories SIGIR (DOI · arXiv) · Agentic Search in the Wild (14M+ requests) SIGIR (DOI · arXiv)

3 The LLM-as-judge reckoning

Everyone now uses LLMs to generate relevance labels — and this year's papers stress-test that dependency rather than accept it. Expect direct pushback (simple classifiers beating prompted LLMs), evidence of judges inflating scores, plus efforts to make LLM judgments more reliable.

Anchors: Topic-Specific Classifiers are Better Relevance Judges than Prompted LLMs SIGIR (DOI) · When LLM Judges Inflate Scores SIGIR (DOI) · Formalized Information Needs Improve LLM Relevance Judgments SIGIR (DOI) · Reasoning with LLMs for Relevance Judgements ICTIR (DOI)

4 The efficiency frontier moved to multi-vector & sparse

As late-interaction (ColBERT-style) and learned-sparse retrieval go mainstream, the research shifts to making them cheap: pruning tokens, compressing multi-vector indexes, custom GPU kernels, and — notably — putting embedding size on a principled scaling curve for the first time.

Anchors: Scaling Laws for Embedding Dimension in IR SIGIR (DOI · arXiv) · Efficient Sparse Retrieval with Lightweight Superblock Pruning SIGIR (DOI) · Multi-Vector Index Compression in Any Modality SIGIR (DOI) · A Voronoi Cell Formulation for Token Pruning SIGIR (DOI)

5 Recommendation collapses into generative retrieval — and GenAI reshapes search itself

SIGIR's single largest cluster is generative recommendation built on semantic IDs, blurring the line between recommendation and generative retrieval. Running alongside it is a sharp empirical strand measuring how AI Overviews and chatbots are changing search behavior in the wild.

Anchors: Universal Item Tokenization for Transferable Generative Recommendation SIGIR (DOI) · Semantic IDs for Recommender Systems at Snapchat SIGIR (DOI) · Are AI Overviews Changing Search Behavior? SIGIR (DOI) · How Generative AI Disrupts Search SIGIR (DOI)

One more thread I noticed: a learning-to-rank theory revival

Underneath the LLM headlines, ICTIR in particular carries a strong return to ranking theory and unbiased LTR: Exposure-Based RL to Rank ICTIR (DOI), Risk Analysis of Stochastic Rankers ICTIR (DOI), LTR via Denoising Diffusion ICTIR (DOI), and SIGIR's Diagnosing Identifiability in Two-Tower Models for Unbiased LTR SIGIR (DOI) and Logit Inflation in ListMLE SIGIR (DOI). The classical questions — exposure, bias, calibration — are being re-derived for a neural, generative world.

Appendix

The full list, grouped the way I sorted it

The 255 papers I went through (211 SIGIR, 44 ICTIR), each with a one-line note and its DOI. Tap DOI to open the paper in the ACM Digital Library; arXiv appears where I could verify a preprint.

1 · Reasoning-first ranking & LLM rerankers

2 · Retrieval for agents, deep research, RAG & QA

3 · Evaluation, relevance judgments & LLM-as-judge

4 · Dense / sparse / multi-vector retrieval & efficiency

5 · Learning-to-rank theory, bias, click models & fairness

6 · Generative recommendation, semantic IDs & LLM recommenders

7 · Recommendation: sequential, multimodal, graph, CF, CTR & ads

8 · Multimodal, cross-modal & structured retrieval

9 · Search behavior, query & intent understanding, GenAI-vs-search

10 · Fact-checking, verification & harmful-content detection

11 · Domain, specialized retrieval & resources

12 · Perspectives & position papers

Sources & method note

ICTIR 2026 — ACM DL proceedings: 10.1145/3805713 · program: sigir-ictir.github.io/ictir2026
SIGIR 2026 — ACM DL proceedings: 10.1145/3805712 · dblp: dblp.org/db/conf/sigir/sigir2026 · accepted papers: sigir2026.org

How I built this: I covered ICTIR 2026 completely (all 44 program papers). SIGIR 2026 has 250+ accepted papers across full, short, resource, reproducibility and industry tracks; this is a near-complete selection of the in-scope ranking/retrieval/RAG/recommendation/evaluation work, sorted into the buckets above. I resolved and verified every DOI through the Crossref metadata API against the 2026 proceedings prefixes (SIGIR 10.1145/3805712, ICTIR 10.1145/3805713) — none are guessed. I left out a handful of very niche non-IR papers and the workshops/tutorials.